J'accuse of February 23, 2024 on the death of the Russian opponent Alexei Navalny - An extremist mercenary in the service of the West or not?

 J'accuse of February 23, 2024 on the death of the Russian opponent Alexei Navalny - An extremist mercenary in the service of the West?

Why do the European Union and the USA insist on condemning the presumed assassination of Alexei Navalny, Putin's historic opponent? A figure constructed over the years, artfully by Western propaganda, in order to weaken the head of the Kremlin and attack him from within as the Americans and their European allies know how to do when they use the pretext of violation of human rights and of the much vaunted democracy. It is an information war as happens when everything needed to defeat the enemy is used in the service of that cause. Even a xenophobic and mercenary extremist like Him. What is shocking in this context is not the only dramatic and unfortunate death of the Russian opponent but it is the exploitation of his death to compensate for the current losses in Ukraine and open a new internal front against Putin. In these hours we are witnessing a waltz of accusations that has no precedent in Western anti-Russian propaganda. The widow Yulia Navalnaya herself directly accuses the Kremlin: she told the press around the world, after receiving the embrace of the president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen, that she would continue the fight of her husband, killed in a remote Gulag in Siberia. In short, if there wasn't all this interest from Europe in supporting her husband before her and her now, she would never have dared to espouse a cause, even one as noble as the democratization of Russia. It is always an arduous and dangerous undertaking, given the previous attempts. But in the end, if we look impartially at current and past historical events, no country can teach the other how to implement and organize the sharing of power, without considering the temperament of its population, its history, its geography and its internal cultures. . Democracy, as the Middle Eastern wars teach us, cannot be transplanted with propaganda, nor with weapons, nor with support for convenient dissidents, nor even with conspiracies and interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign country, so as is being asked today by the West with its proposal for an international commission of inquiry. The real objective of all this: and that through democracy itself we want to dismantle the Russian Federation just as the former Yugoslavia was dismantled in order to allow its infiltration and ultimately the conquest of its immense mineral and natural resources.

The issue of democracy and its construction must be addressed with direct dialogue, with the sharing of resources and economic and cultural policies, as well as common defense. We have seen the havoc of the American wars in the Middle East which in the instrumentally declared attempt to transplant democracy, by installing friendly opponents and totalitarian regimes, have brought that geographical area to the brink of total economic, political, social and security ruin which lasts until to date. Why don't you set up your own commissions of inquiry against the crimes perpetrated by the Israeli Army? Weren't the political regimes of the past more guaranteed than these violent fools who came on American tanks with projects and dreams that were never implemented? The truth is shocking and what is so sorry is this waltz of lies and mirages which only serves to aggravate relations with the Russian Federation and hide the truth about the true objectives of the West.